« CPI and School Funding | Main | Thank You »

October 15, 2008

Comments

Brad Jolly

We disagree as to whether 59 is a good idea John, but we agree that the ads for it are disingenuous at best. Thank you for your intellectual honesty on this particular issue.

Can I count on you to similarly denounce the "pro" side of 3A and 3B for suggesting that the total cost of both would be a little over $200 on a $300,000 home?

Jo Charlton

Tax impacts can be found here:
http://www.wechooseexcellence.com/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=26&tmpl=component&format=raw&Itemid=89
The bond costs less (even though it is for more money) because it is spread over 20 years. So does this mean you support 3A and 3B now you know it is only $223/ year on a 300K home? Such a small investment for the future of our children!

Mike Patzkowsky

I too was very dissapointed by the ad. An ad that showed politicians shaking down students was and is completely inappropriate. I was dissapointed for a variety of reasons, from using actors portraying children and violence. Democrat or Republican, supporter or not this is a poor representation of what politicians are or really should be about. I truly believe that these types of ads for or against a ballot issue which you may or may not support should not include the types of messages and images seen in this ad.

The comments to this entry are closed.